Monday, September 1, 2014

The Things They Carried: Writing Assignment

Assignment: In a brief narrative, write about the kinds of things you carry. Think and write about what these things say about you. You can use physical and non-physical things… but you have to be specific.
My Response:
            Everyone carries things with them through their day to day live. While some are common like cellphones, keys and wallets, others are more “out of the box” like the pair of pantyhose that Henry Dobbins carried in The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien. There are also the burdens that people carry on their shoulders that you can’t actually see. For example, people may carry the death of a love one or their fears. The things that people carry are unique to that specific person. Which begs the question: What is it that I carry?
            One thing that I almost always have on me is a novel of some sort. At almost any given time, I have at least one, but normally two or three, books on my person. The genre doesn’t make a difference to me. I’ll happily devour anything from The Book Thief to the Harry Potter series to The Art of Racing in the Rain. I enjoy having a portable getaway into a different reality at my fingertips and books certainly fulfill that.
            Another thing I carry with me are my goals for the future and my determination to reach (and possibly exceed) them. For about four years now, I’ve had the outline of a plan for myself. I hope to graduate my high-school with as many accomplishments that I can possibly get my hands on and hope to land myself a ranking in the top ten of my class. This along with numerous other paddings to my college application (including being the statistics manager for three sports, holding a summer job working with children and my involvement in a number of clubs and societies) will hopefully get me accepted to a good university. I’m not looking to go Ivy League, of course, because that isn’t a practicality. However, I want to attend a nice, respectable college. From there, it’s my dream to study abroad in England, a place I’ve always had an urge to live in, even if it’s just for a semester. After I graduate with a major in English and possibly a minor in business, my dream career would be as a literary agent or editor. These goals and my determination to fulfill them are something I carry with me daily to motivate me.
             One more thing that I normally have on me is my opinions. While I can easily come off as quiet at first, that’s just a ruse. When I find something that I think is worth speaking up about, I quickly find my voice. However, I’ll always listen to other people and their differing opinions, but it’s normally just so I can inform them that they’re wrong afterwards. I can be quite stubborn with my opinions and a bit argumentative, but, in my defense, I’m normally right in the end. However, on the rare occasion that I’m wrong, I accept defeat gallantly.
            Finally, I always have jewelry on me in the form of my ring and my bracelets. The ring is something I’ve had for five or six years now. My mother and I have matching ones after an incident where I lost mine, bought a new one and then someone returned the original one. Since I wasn’t going to wear two identical rings, I gave one to my mum (which she paid me back for) and I wear the original one and haven’t taken it off since getting it back. It’s a beautiful silver ring with a blue stone. It’s important to me because I earned it with my own money from baby-sitting, it reminds me of my mother and I like what the color blue symbolizes (like trust, honesty, sincerity and many other things. I’m also almost always wearing an array of bracelets (and if I’m not wearing them then you can assume I woke up late). This includes a few Harry Potter ones and a Doctor Who one. I also have two Alex and Ani bracelets, one from my aunt and one from my boyfriend that he gave me for Valentine’s Day. Finally, I have a thick leather bracelet which is a part of a pair. My boyfriend has the other one. These are important to me because they symbolize many things that I value like my family, boyfriend and my longtime love for books and certain television shows.

            I don’t carry much, but the things I do carry are very precious and meaningful to me. I think it’s also safe to say that they’re unique to me and I won’t find someone else carrying the same load. In conclusion, the things that are always with me are books, my jewelry, my goals, determination and opinions. 

The Things They Carried: The Lives of the Dead

Question: What is the moral of the dead KIA’s? Consider Mitchell Sander’s view.
Answer:
            Mitchell Sanders, while viewing corpses, articulately says, “Death sucks.” (O’Brien, 243). While the thought is simple, it’s undoubtedly true. Once a person dies, they leave their life, including the people and things that they love within that life. While it’s still under speculation as to what actually happens after someone dies, the undisputable fact is that no matter what happens, you won’t be living the life that you worked so hard to create anymore. That, plus the fact that your body becomes a bloated, gassy corpse with a horrible stench, heavily supports Sanders interpretation. However, that doesn’t mean it’s the end. While your corpse is stuck, your spirit, the part that makes you be you (like your thoughts, passions and memories), goes on to whatever comes next. I think that the moral of this story is that yes, death sucks, but it’s not the end.



The Things They Carried: Night Life

Question: How did Rat Kiley get out of active duty? What is the author’s purpose in including this story so late in the novel and right after The Ghost Soldiers?
Answer:
            Rat Kiley gets out of active duty, technically, because he was ‘accidentally’ shot in the foot. However, the true story is that he went crazy and shot his own foot, very much on purpose. It seems that the dark (the men were traveling at night) plus the traumas of seeing men with gaping wounds or dead was too much for Rat and he lost his mind, seeing everyone (including himself) dead when they weren’t. The horrors of war finally push him over the edge.
            O’Brien put this in the end of the novel for a specific reason. He wanted the readers to get to know Rat Kiley as a good soldier and well trained medic before doing this to him. He wanted the readers to witness how the war can change a man so completely, bring a strong man like Rat to insanity. The fact that it follows right after “The Ghost Soldiers” is because that’s the chapter where Rat shows remarkable medic skills when treating Tim’s bullet wound and his leaving the platoon is first mentioned.


The Things They Carried: The Ghost Soldiers

Question: This is one of the only stories where the reader does not know the ending in advance. Why might O’Brien want this story to be particularly suspenseful?
Answer:
            O’Brien didn’t tell the reader the ending to “The Ghost Soldiers” in advance, because he wanted the reader to doubt Tim. Tim becomes malicious and cruel during this chapter as he seeks revenge against Jorgenson, a medic who almost cost Tim his life due to a mistake and accidentally lost him his spot as a soldier in their platoon. Although the whole situation was accidental and the medic apologizes, Tim cannot let it go and becomes obsessive. The reader begins to worry about what kind of man Tim is becoming as he recruits Azar, a soldier who has been rude and awful throughout the entire novel, to assist him and messes with Jorgenson with horrible, psychological mind games that makes Jorgenson think he is under attack. In the end, Tim tries to stop Azar once he sees the effect it has on Jorgenson and he apologizes. However, for a good part of the chapter, the reader witnesses Tim’s behavior and has doubts about what kind of man he is.


The Things They Carried: Stockings

Question: Consider the comparison the author makes between Dobbins and America. Does the author like America? Does he respect it?
Answer:

            Based off of O’Brien’s description of Henry Dobbins, he seems like a good guy, but not somebody you would look to as a leader or to make decisions. Tim says, “Henry Dobbins was a good man, and a superb soldier, but sophistication was not his strong suit.” (O’Brien, 117). This shows that O’Brien likes America, but does not respect it. While America may have good intentions and nice beliefs, it’s not the kind of country that he trusts to make decisions or to lead people. This shows that while he likes America for its good qualities, he can’t respect it if he can’t trust its leadership abilities. 

The Things They Carried: Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong

Question: What transforms Mary Ann Bell into a predatory killer? Does it matter that Mary Ann is a woman? How so? What does this chapter tell the reader about the nature of the Vietnam War?
Answer:
            Mary Ann Bell comes to Vietnam in the middle of the Vietnam War as a young, innocent and naïve girl. Slowly, she begins to expose herself to the harsh realities of war and seems to accept them very well. She’s surrounded by injured soldiers who have missing limbs and bleeding profusely and visits a village where the children were unclothed and people were probably underfed. It’s not surprising that these events could easily begin her descent into insanity since they are far from anything she has ever seen before. Also, as she feels the rush from adrenaline while assisting the medics, she might start to crave that feeling and do more and more things to get it. Between her adrenaline hunger and the shocking events she recently saw, she decided to go with the Greenies, which probably encouraged both preexisting problems and maybe made her desire the wilderness as well. As she continues to spend more time with the Greenies, she changes. By the time Mark tries to stop it, she’s already changed and his efforts just push her away. She leaves with the Greenies and gets sunk in deeper and deeper until she’s gone forever. In short, it seems that Mary Ann couldn’t handle the horror of wars or resist the addicting feelings of adrenaline and the wilderness.
            It is important that Mary Ann is a woman. At the time, women are viewed as simply sweet and gentle. When Mary Ann arrives, they assume that she won’t turn dangerous because she is a woman and that’s not how they are. However, just like some men do, the war quickly changes her and she loses her mind. The Vietnam War changes people. Sometimes is just makes boys into men or it brings the courage and leadership out in people. However, other times it breaks people. It gives them the taste of blood or shows them things that they can’t handle seeing and they go crazy. Either way when someone goes into this war, they come out as a changed person.


The Things They Carried: The Dentist

Question: Characterize Curt Lemon and why he behaves the way he does. How does this affect your reading of the previous chapter? What is the purpose of placing this chapter directly after How to Tell a True War Story?
Answer:
            Curt Lemon was a soldier who wanted to be seen as tough. He boasted and did crazy dangerous things so that he could talk them up. It seems that he had a low self-esteem issue and was worried that other people would begin to view him as he viewed himself. He did dangerous things and wouldn’t stop talking about it because he wanted people to think of him as a dangerous, crazy, tough guy and he didn’t want them to forget it. He worried when he showed the smallest sign of weakness and rectified it as quickly as possible.
            After learning this, it affects my initial view of him and therefore my interpretation in the chapter previous. I still think that he was wrong to be reckless and dangerous, but I’m more sympathetic of him now. All he was trying to do was appear tough, probably so that the other guys would like him or at least respect him. While it doesn’t excuse his actions, it makes it more understandable. After all, Tim described him and Rat as “kids” (which presumes that they’re probably 18 or 19, if Tim, a 21 year old, views them as kids). He was probably just a boy who either joined the war or was drafted and wanted the older guys to think he was just as strong as them and whatnot. After knowing this information, the last chapter is sadder to me now that I feel that I know Curt Lemon better and his actions are more understandable and forgivable. The author put this chapter after “How to Tell a True War Story” to show that you shouldn’t judge people because you never know the reasons or stories behind the way they behave.


The Things They Carried: How to Tell a True War Story

Question: Often, in the course of his stories O’Brien tells the reader beforehand whether or not the story will have a happy ending. Why might he do this? According to the author, how do you tell a true war story?
Answer:
            When O’Brien tells a story, he often says whether or not it will have a happy ending beforehand. This is because a lot of the time the story is not about the ending. It’s about the middle, the course of actions that take place to get there. More often than not, telling the end doesn’t ruin the story. It just sparks more interest for the reader because they’re curious as to how the story has gotten to the place to allow that ending to occur. Also it helps the reader to view things that the author means them to be viewed from the beginning. Occasionally the reader will think that something is good when the author means it to be bad. For example, in the chapter “On the Rainy River”, I thought that Tim joining the army and not running away was a sign of courage when the author meant it as a sign of cowardice and a cause for embarrassment. If he had not made that clear within the beginning by saying “This is one story I’ve never told before… To go into it, I’ve always thought, would only cause embarrassment…” (O’Brien, 39), I would have never known that it was something he was ashamed of.
            According to O’Brien, there are a lot of elements to telling a true war story. One important factor is that it must never have a moral to it and the point of the story, if there is one, isn’t something that is ever really comprehended. If the war story does have a moral, it’s most likely not true. However, if it manages to be both true and have a moral, then the moral is buried very deeply inside it. Due to the witness’s perspective of the events being more surreal than the actual events, it’s likely that the story will seem fake, which just proves that it’s real. True war stories don’t really have an ending and can go on forever. Finally, to tell a true war story, the story isn’t really to be about war. It’s about the things that happened during the war that contradicted the war, the things that stood out because they weren’t really about war at all.



The Things They Carried: Friends

Question: Why are Enemies and Friends back to back in this book? What is the reader supposed to learn about humanity from these chapters?
Answer:
            The chapters “Friends” and “Enemies” are back to back in the novel, because they’re related in a way. For one, both focus mainly on two soldiers, Lee Strunk and Dave Jensen. It shows the relationship between the two, although they’re in very different stages of their relationship in the chapters. In “Enemies”, the two men are fighting and are unable to trust one another. In “Friends”, the chapter that follows “Enemies”, the two men are friends and close again. They’ve even entered into a pact of sorts that says that if one of them is very badly injured (as in paralyzed or wheelchair bound), the other will kill him. Then Strunk gets injured and loses his leg. However he tells Jensen not to follow through with their deal because he, while in denial, believes that the doctors will be able to put the leg back on. Jensen agrees with him, although it seems like he doesn’t believe it, and later Strunk dies from his injuries, which relieves Jensen because he wouldn’t have to kill Strunk himself. This chapter shows that the two men are close again and that Jensen, who has probably had to kill men in the war before, seems like he wouldn’t have been able to kill Strunk. These two chapters being besides each other shows that the soldiers, although they sometimes fight, care for each other. The relationships between the soldiers reminds me a lot of a relationship between siblings or brothers. They fight sometimes, but no matter what they care for each other, want the best for one another and could probably never seriously hurt each other on purpose.
            There are a few characteristics that are mostly exclusive to humans and humanity. Fear, stress, paranoia, compassion, a sense of duty and forgiveness are examples of this and they’re shown in the chapters “Enemies” and “Friends”. During “Enemies”, Jensen, after hurting Strunk during a fight, worries that Strunk will try and get revenge. Jensen becomes crazy with fear, stress and paranoia. The book describes this and says, “Jensen couldn’t relax. Like fighting two different wars, he said. No safe ground: enemies everywhere. No front or rear. At night he had trouble sleeping—a skittish feeling-- always on guard, hearing strange noises in the dark, imagining a grenade rolling into his foxhole or the tickle of a knife against his ear. The distinction between good guys and bad guys had disappeared for him. Even in times of relative safety, while the rest of us took it easy, Jensen would be sitting with his back against a stone wall, weapon across his knees, watching Lee Strunk with quick, nervous eyes. It got to the point finally where he lost control.” (O’Brien, 63) and this leads to Jensen having a breakdown. This chapter is trying to explain to the reader that fear and paranoia can overwhelm and take over a person and their life causing them to act differently and irrationally. During “Friends”, Jensen and Strunk are friends again and make a pact that one would kill the other if he becomes extremely and permanently injured. Jensen is put into this position when Strunk loses his leg, but Strunk dies before he has to follow through. It’s obvious that Jensen has no desire to kill his friend, no matter what his injury is. However, it seems that he would’ve done it, if Strunk hadn’t died on his own, due to his promise that he made and because it’s what his friend had wanted. This seems to be telling the reader that sometimes people have to do things that they don’t want to do because of their sense of duty or compassion. Both chapters put together show two men recovering from a fight and learn to trust one another again, which leads to a strong friendship between them. This is an example of forgiveness and shows the reader that by forgiving and letting go of old feuds, new and great things have the opportunity to be built.


The Things They Carried: Enemies

Question: What can be learned from this story about soldiers during the war?
Answer:

            The chapter “Enemies” in The Things They Carried tells of two soldiers in the same platoon, Lee Strunk and Dave Jensen getting into a fight over a trivial reason. It results in Strunk having semi-serious injuries involving a broken nose and Jensen gets so paranoid that Strunk will retaliate that he goes crazy and paranoid. At one point he begins screaming and shooting off bullets into the sky. Eventually, Jensen breaks his own nose in an effort to even the score between himself and Strunk, which ends Jensen’s paranoia. This chapter shows the high tensions and pressure on the soldiers in a war. They’re wound very tightly and their anxieties are heightened. A small fight between two men over something unimportant would normally result in a few punches and maybe some distance between the men for a while in a normal setting. However, during the war, the same situation causes actual injuries for the one man and the other man becomes increasingly paranoid due to how tightly the soldiers are wound. It also shows that in a place like war where the soldiers are surrounded by enemies on all sides, the men need to know that they can trust the other soldiers to protect them and keep them safe. Once Jensen lost that feeling of trust, he was driven to the brink of his sanity. 

The Things They Carried: On The Rainy River

Question: In this chapter the reader learns of 21 year old O’Brien’s theory of courage: “Courage, I seemed to think, comes to us in finite quantities, like an inheritance, and by being frugal and stashing it away and letting it earn interest, we steadily increase our moral capital in preparation for that day when the account must be drawn down. It was a comforting theory.” What might the 43 year old O’Brien’s theory of courage be? Were you surprised when he described his entry into the war as an act of cowardice? What is the relationship between shame and courage, according to the author?
Answer:
            At 21, O’Brien’s theory of courage, as stated in the book, says: “Courage, I seemed to think, comes to us in finite quantities, like an inheritance, and by being frugal and stashing it away and letting it earn interest, we steadily increase our moral capital in preparation for that day when the account must be drawn down. It was a comforting theory.” (O’Brien, 40). O’Brien, now 43 years old, would most likely have a very different theory after gathering 22 more years of experience and his time in the war. It seems that if O’Brien were to have a theory now, it might be something along the lines of: “A courageous person doesn’t wait for an opportunity to be courageous arises. They make their own opportunities.” It seems that he would think this due to his past experiences. He used to believe that people had courage that was saved up for some huge act of heroism and courageousness. After his experience with getting what he saw as that opportunity and being unable to take it, he’d probably change his mind. He probably now thinks that when you have courage, you don’t wait for a chance to use it, you just use it.
             Personally, I was surprised to hear O’Brien describe him entering the war as being cowardly. It is widely viewed that soldiers are heroes. Therefore it would seem that he joining the war would be an act of heroism and not cowardice.

            O’Brien seems to believe that there is a direct relationship between shame and courage. He thinks that a person (or at least himself) needs to be ashamed of any situation where they fail to show courage. For example, when Tim fails to run away to Canada, an act that he views as being cowardly, he feels so ashamed of the event that he never tells anyone for 22 years. This proves that O’Brien sees the lack of courage in an event as a reason for shame.

The Things They Carried: Spin

Question: “On occasions the war was like a Ping-Pong ball. You could put a fancy spin on it, you could make it dance.” What does this mean? What is the “spin” O’Brien is talking about? Identify where in the chapter O’Brien “spins” the story, events, etc. What is he trying to show the reader?
Answer:
            In the novel The Things They Carried, Tim, the narrator, says “On occasions the war was like a ping-pong ball. You could put a fancy spin on it, you could make it dance.” (O’Brien, 32). A ping-pong ball’s main purpose it to be bounced and, in the game of ping-pong, it can easily just be bounced back and forth between the opponents in the simplest way possible and the game will work perfectly. However, if there’s a wish to “spice it up” or make it interesting, the ball can do more than just bounce. It can spin and dance. This is to say that the way the ball is hit is up to the person hitting it and if they wish, they can make it fun or boring or interesting. The metaphor means is that the way the person playing ping-pong, or maybe a soldier, makes the ball bounce, or looks at the war, can change the overall experience. It’s another way of saying “life is what you make it”. These soldiers are in the war and that’s not something that’s going to change anytime soon. However, the way they view it is completely up to them. The “spin” that Tim O’Brien is referring to is having a positive outlook and making the best of what you’re given.
            O’Brien adds “spin” to his story by showing the positive or fun or even interesting events that took place in the war with his soldiers. He mentions the soldiers playing checkers, Lavender adopting a puppy and an old man who helped them that they grew to love. One example of this is when Tim describes a scene by saying “Or Kiowa teaching a rain dance to Rat Kiley and Dave Jensen, the three of them whooping and leaping around barefoot while a bunch of villagers looked on with a mixture of fascination and giggly horror.” (O’Brien, 36). He shows the things that they did to keep themselves going throughout the war.
            O’Brien is trying to show the readers what the war is like. A lot of people when they think of the war envision nonstop violence, killing and gunfire. While those things do play a huge part in the war, there are other things, too. There’s jokes, pranks, funny memories, deep conversations and games of chess. O’Brien wants his readers to realize this.

            

The Things They Carried: Love

Question: What is the purpose of this chapter? What kind of love is O’Brien talking about? Jimmy and Martha? Jimmy and the platoon? Jimmy and Tim? Tim and his work? Love for his country?
Answer:
            This chapter’s purpose is to give a look at how some soldiers can be after the war and how these particular characters are doing. The book reads that all the two men, Jimmy Cross and the narrator, did when they met back up was “drank coffee and smoked cigarettes and talked about everything we had seen and done so long ago, all the things we still carried through our lives.” (O’Brien, 27).  They talk of the war and discuss memories, good and bad, including Ted Lavender’s death. It also shows that Jimmy Cross survives the war and isn’t with Martha, although he still loves her. It also reveals that the narrator is a writer. This chapter ends with the two men discussing a book that the narrator may write and saying, “He hesitated for a second. “And do me a favor. Don’t mention anything about---“
            “No,” I said. “I won’t.”” (O’Brien, 30). This is an obvious ploy to build suspense over what the event is that they aren’t mentioning.

            The love that O’Brien is referring to in the chapter title is the love between Jimmy and Tim. After going through a tremendous, life-changing experience together, it isn’t uncommon for two people to connect in a permanent way and war is certainly an example of this. It seems that Jimmy and Tim bonded over the horrible things they witnessed and from having pretty much lived together, along with the other men, during the war. There’s also an underlying current of a love for the other members of the platoon. Both men reminisce over the things the other men did and carried. For example, Tim says, “…and not much later we were laughing about some of the craziness that used to go on. The way Henry Dobbins carried his girlfriend’s pantyhose around his neck like a comforter. Kiowa’s moccasins and hunting hatchet. Rat Kiley’s comic books.” (O’Brien, 28).  They seem to love each other and the platoon in a brotherly way. 

The Things They Carried: The Things They Carried

Question: In the list of all the things the soldiers carried, what item was most surprising? Which item did you find the most evocative of war? Which items stay with you? Explain the meaning of the title “The Things They Carried”. Explain the metaphor of weight.
Answer:
            Among the items that the American soldiers in the Vietnam War carried, there was one that surprised me. One of the soldiers, Ted Lavender, carried tranquilizers and dope, which the book explains by saying, “Ted Lavender, who was scared, carried tranquilizers until he was shot in the head.” (O’Brien, 2) and “Until he was shot, Ted Lavender carried 6 or 7 ounces of premium dope, which for him was a necessity.” (O’Brien, 3). This object surprises me the most, not because it’s truly surprising that a scared man is self-medicating during a stressful time like war but, because of the ideals that I held soldiers to at a younger age. When you’re younger, you’re taught to view policeman, fireman, soldiers and people of similar standings and occupations as good guys and heroes. While most of them definitely are, the heroes you, or at least I, equated them with were not just people who selfishly did good deeds and whatnot, but flawless fighters without weaknesses. Now that I’m older, I realize that that’s obviously not a realistic view. However, it is, like most things you decide when you’re younger, imprinted in my mind still. This has made Ted Lavender’s drugs the most surprising thing to me for it revealed a weakness where I was not expecting to find one.
            The items that I view as most evocative of war would have to be the weapons that they carry. While it is an obvious choice, it is the one that I see as most fitting. In the book, they speak of many different weapons, some of which they describe by saying, “In addition to the three standard weapons- the M-60, M-16, and M-79--- they carried whatever presented itself, or whatever seemed appropriate as a means of killing or staying alive. They carried catch-as-catch-can. At various times, in various situations, they carried M-14s and CAR-15s and Swedish Ks and grease guns and captured AK-47s and Chi-Coms and RPGs and Simonov carbines and black market Uzis and .38-caliber Smith & Wesson handguns and 66 mm LAWs and shotguns and silencers and blackjacks and bayonets and C-4 plastic explosives.” (O’Brien, 7). They also mention that one soldier, Henry Dobbins, carries “between 10 and 15 pounds of ammunition” (O’Brien, 5). It’s not surprising that there are guns and weapons there, but to hear the numbers and names of various weapons makes it seem a lot more real. To me, guns and weapons are symbolic to violence and there’s nothing more violent than a war. The weaponry that the soldiers carry is the most suggestive of the war that they fight.
            The items that stay in my mind the most would have to be the letters, photos, pantyhose, M&Ms and Kool-Aid. The letters and photos are in my mind, because, in every war movie, book or show that I’ve been witness to, there’s always at least one soldier with a picture or letter from somebody waiting for him/her at home. It was one of the first things that came into my mind upon hearing the title and has managed to stay in there since. The pantyhose are an item that Henry Dobbins carried, which the book mentions, “Henry Dobbins carried his girlfriend’s pantyhose wrapped around his neck as a comforter.” (O’Brien, 10). These particular item isn’t the thing stuck in my mind, but more so the adorable mental image of a soldier with lacy pantyhose wrapped around his neck in a scarf-like fashion. I also find the sentiment of him carrying them and her sending them in the first place as romantic and cute. Finally is the M&M candy and Kool- Aid. These stay in my head for various reasons. One being that neither are very healthy or nutritional and I equate soldiers with being healthy and strong. Another being that it’s crazy to consider that the soldiers are roughing it out in the Vietnam climates while sipping on Kool- Aid and munching on candy. The two images are so different that my mind has a hard time processing them together.
            This chapter of the novel is titled “The Things They Carried”. It means that it shows the burdens that they carried with them through the war- physically, mentally and spiritually. The list of things they carry differs from ammunition to the deaths of others to moccasins to letters to slingshots to M&Ms to fear. One passage that describes this combination of physical and mental burden well talks about various weapons that they have and says, “… Some carry white phosphorous grenades. They carried all they could bear, and then some, including a silent awe for the terrible power of the things they carried.” (O’Brien, 7). Weight is a very common factor within this chapter since they often include the weights that accompany each item (for example, “… the M-60, which weighed 23 pounds unloaded…” (O’Brien, 5)). However, weight is more than just a measurement that can be taken with a scale. There are different types of weight that are immeasurable. For example, First Lieutenant Jimmy Cross feels responsible for Ted Lavender’s death and holds the weight of that and its guilt. It’s not something that can be put to a measurement of pounds or grams, but it’s real nonetheless. The weight you carry on your shoulders can be both physical and mental. Both are just as real as the other. The only difference between the two is that it’s much harder to put down the mental weight that you carry.


Wednesday, August 27, 2014

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Nine

 Question: How does the ending shape your overall interpretation of the novel? What themes stand out to you? Speculate on why this work is an American classic that is still studied and remembered (and filmed- need I say Leo D.)
Answer:
            Personally, I think the novel is amazing, albeit incredibly sad. The part that stood out to me the most was the funeral and its attendants (or lack there of). Gatsby was a celebrated, hospitable, giving man during his life and he was honored by Nick, a man he knew for a few months, Owl Eyes, a man who he barely knew and vice versa, and his father. It’s sad to think how many people were only around to take from him and how they stopped showing up once he had nothing more to give. It shows how a true friend can be worth a million fake ones in the long run. His empty funeral makes me pity Gatsby even more and be disgusted by all the characters who used him.
            Another part of the ending that surprised me was Tom. The ending made me dislike him a little bit less. While he’s still a selfish, money centered man who cheats on his wife, I did feel sorry for him for a moment when he said, “”And if you think that I didn’t have my share of suffering- look here, when I went to give up that flat and saw that damn box of dog biscuits sitting there on the sideboard, I sat down and cried like a baby. By god it was awful—“” (Fitzgerald, 179). I still don’t agree with his course of actions throughout the novel, but it was shocking to see him as a human with emotions and sorrow.
            There are a few main themes in The Great Gatsby. One would obviously have to be money. It plays a main factor throughout the entire story. For example, it was Gatsby’s dream to become wealthy and the money, once he gained it, never helped him. It allowed him to see Daisy again, but, since it led to his death and she didn’t care for him, it probably would’ve been better if that never happened. It kept his house filled with people at his parties and on his beach, but they didn’t care for him. They weren’t his friends. They were people who took advantage of his hospitality and didn’t bother to show up at his funeral. One of the only people who loved him and cared for him was his dad and his dad was poor and wouldn’t have cared if Gatsby was too. It simply shows that the old proverb is right: Money can’t buy you happiness.
            Another strong theme is ‘Old Money’ verses ‘New Money’. Old Money being defined us people who come from wealthy families and are given their money and New Money being people who have earned and worked for their money. This theme is so involved with the novel that it effects everything from the people to the setting. The novel is set mainly on the West Egg and the East Egg, but they could easily just be renamed the New Money Egg and the Old Money Egg, respectively. An example of New Money would be Gatsby, who was born poor and worked for his money. An example of Old Money would be Tom, Daisy and Jordan. The novel seems to suggest two things about these groups: Old Money doesn’t like New Money and Old Money consist of cold selfish people.
            It’s easy to see that Old Money has no tolerance for New Money. New Money is very flashy and like to have fun with their money, which is evident in Gatsby. He buys expensive cars and hosts costly parties. His parties were described as, “There was music from my neighbor's house through the summer nights. In his blue gardens men and girls came and went like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and the stars… At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to make a Christmas tree of Gatsby's enormous garden. On buffet tables, garnished with glistening hors-d'oeuvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.

By seven o'clock the orchestra has arrived, no thin five-piece affair, but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos, and low and high drums… The bar is in full swing, and floating rounds of cocktails permeate the garden outside, until the air is alive with chatter and laughter, and casual innuendo and introductions forgotten on the spot, and enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other's names.” (Fitzgerald, 39-40). On the other hand, Old Money people are very prim and proper. For example, when we first meet Daisy and Jordan, they are sitting with their noses turned up in the air in a manner that is so proper that Nick describes it as, “… as if she were balancing something on it which was likely to fall.” (Fitzgerald, 8). When Old Money witnesses New Money’s behavior, they’re normally offended. An example of this is when Daisy attends one of Gatsby’s parties. Nick states, “But the rest offended her-and inarguably, because it wasn't a gesture but an emotion. She was appalled by West Egg, this unprecedented "place" that Broadway had begotten upon a Long Island fishing village-appalled by its raw vigor that chafed under the old euphemisms and by the too obtrusive fate that herded its inhabitants along a short-cut from nothing to nothing. She saw something awful in the very simplicity she failed to understand.” (Fitzgerald, 107). It is clear that Old Money is unable to understand New Money since Old Money grew up in wealthy families and were taught to act in a certain way. The problem between them is that Old Money won’t accept New Money because they act differently.
            The people of Old Money have a lot more flaws than their inability to accept people who act differently than them. Their main issue seems to be that the entire lot of them are selfish, shallow people. There are numerous examples of this throughout the novel. In chapter two, Tom selfishly forces Nick to meet Myrtle without consulting with him despite Nick not wanting to. He takes no time to consider that it might be uncomfortable to Nick to witness his cousin’s husband cheat on her or that Nick may have preexisting plans. Another example comes from Jordan Baker and her driving skills. Nick says, “”You’re a rotten driver,” I protested. “Either you ought to be more careful, or you oughtn’t to drive at all.”
“I am careful.”
“No, you’re not.”
“Well, other people are,” she said lightly.
“What’s that got to do with it?”
“They’ll keep out of my way,” she insisted. “It takes two to make an accident.”” (Fitzgerald, 58). Jordan is so careless and unthoughtful of others that she can’t even bother to drive correctly or not drive at all. She risks getting into a car accident or possibly hitting somebody and it doesn’t even faze her. She just expects everyone else to get out of her way so that they won’t crash. It’s an extremely self-centered sentiment. There selfishness is shown quite heavily towards the end of the book. Daisy is selfish when she jerks around Gatsby’s feelings and when she lets him take the blame for the hit and run. She’s also selfish when she has Gatsby sit outside her house all night to ensure her safety and then doesn’t even attempt to say goodbye to him or Nick before she leaves town. She never even attends Gatsby’s funeral after claiming to have loved him. Nick refers to Tom and Daisy and says, “It was all very careless and confused. They were careless people, Tom and Daisy--they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back to their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made...“ (Fitzpatrick, 179). This seems to be something that could be said about most of the Old Money in The Great Gatsby. The whole novel seems to insinuate that people who have never worked for their money, people who never felt the burning of needing something that they didn’t have the means to get, were left cold, shallow and selfish.

            It’s not surprising that this novel is revered by many and still popular in our culture today. It’s the kind of story that changes people’s perspectives on things. It shows you how things aren’t always black and white. For example, if you heard that a man was a bootlegger and was very illegal and there was a lot of mystery and suspicion surrounding him in a story, it’d be easy to assume that he was the ‘bad guy’ or antagonist. This story however shows that Gatsby, a man that earns his money in an illegal business, is still a good guy while the Buchanans, a couple from wealthy families and such, play the ‘villain’ role much better. This novel also depicts the saying “Life isn’t fair”. This is shown when Gatsby is murdered for things he never did while the guilty people get away free. Then to have Gatsby, a man who was always hospitable and kind, have a funeral with three attendants certainly seems wrong as well. The Great Gatsby is a timeless tale that covers themes regarding money, injustice and people not always being as they seem. It takes place in the 1920s with their lavish clothes and parties (for the rich at least). It has romance between Daisy and Gatsby, Nick and Jordan and Myrtle and Tom. It’s a realistic and moving story involving some main characters that you get to know and love. The writing is beautiful and captivating. It’s no wonder that it’s still popular today in both the literature and cinematic worlds!

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Eight

Question: Select a passage that reveals Nick’s attitudes. Discuss how this passage contributes to your interpretation of the work as a whole, including strategies employed by the author to reveal these attitudes. Comment on the role they play in your own reaction to the ending and the novel as a whole.
Answer:
            Chapter Eight brings with us the aftermath of Myrtle’s death, which results in the death of Wilson and Gatsby. Before that, Nick gets to say what turned out to be his last words to Gatsby. He says, “We shook hands and I started away. Just before I reached the hedge I remembered something and turned around.
“They’re a rotten crowd,” I shouted across the lawn. “You’re worth the whole damn bunch put together.”
I’ve always been glad I said that. It was the only compliment I ever gave him, because I disapproved of him from beginning to end. First he nodded politely, and then his face broke into that radiant and understanding smile, as if we’d been in ecstatic cahoots on that fact all the time. His gorgeous pink rag of a suit made a bright spot of color against the white steps, and I thought of the night when I first came to his ancestral home, three months before. The lawn and drive had been crowded with the faces of those who guessed at his corruption—and he had stood on those steps, concealing his incorruptible dream, as he waved them good-by.
I thanked him for his hospitality. We were always thanking him for that—I and the others.” (Fitzgerald, 154).
            The most important relationship in this novel is the friendship between Gatsby and Nick because it’s one of the only real ones. Most of the others mentioned are shallow and fake. For example, Gatsby’s ‘friends’ that comes to his parties are just using his hospitality. Daisy’s ‘feelings’ for Gatsby are either very fragile or non-existent based on how she quickly changes her mind about him at the hotel. Even the mother-daughter relationship between Daisy and Pammy is superficial beings as Daisy treats her more like a toy that she can take out to dress up and show around before putting her back away and not bothering with her. In comparison to those sorry excuses for a connection between two people, Gatsby and Nick’s friendship stands out. They tell each other things that they don’t reveal to others (for example, Gatsby tells Nick about his life and family), they help each other out and simply care for one another (like when they stay awake all night after Myrtle’s death because both are unable of dealing with it). Therefore, Nick’s opinion and attitude towards and about Gatsby is very important. In this passage, he reveals that he spent a lot of time judging and opposed to his behavior and whatnot. However, as he gets to truly know Gatsby, he, while still sometimes disapproving of his course of actions, finds that Gatsby’s motives are pure and good. Gatsby is a good person, plain and simple. He’s made mistakes and might not always be on the right side of the law, but he is undoubtedly a good person and Nick can appreciate that when they’re surrounded by all of the fake and selfish people. What is Nick’s attitude towards Gatsby? He makes it very clear in his last words to his gentlemanly neighbor, “You’re worth the whole damn bunch put together.” (Fitzgerald, 154).
            Nick also makes his attitude towards Daisy, Tom and Jordan very clear. He ends chapter seven by saying, ““I’d had enough of all of them for one day, and suddenly that included Jordan too.” (Fitzgerald, 142) and it seems that a few hours to calm down and reflect has certainly not changed his opinion. To Gatsby, he says, “They’re a rotten crowd.” (Fitzgerald, 154). While he’s had his suspicions the whole time, there was no question about it anymore. Nick has seen who these people truly are and it’s not a pretty sight. They’re bad people in the sense that they only care for themselves and their money. Nick has clearly decided that they aren’t the type of people he should surround himself with. They’re worth millions monetarily, but when it comes to substance and character, they’re dirt poor.

            Nick’s attitudes don’t affect my interpretation of the story much, because I agree with him on it. This passage did assist me in figuring out Gatsby’s death before it occurred though due to its blatant foreshadowing. Nick states, “I’ve always been glad I said that. It was the only compliment I ever gave him” (Fitzgerald, 154). That excerpt along with the emphasis on their goodbyes makes it clear that they wouldn’t ever see each other again, which is probably because one of them is about to die. It’s only logical to assume that it would be Gatsby since the story focuses on him, Nick is the narrator (and narrators don’t often get killed off in books), Gatsby is involved in dangerous and illegal business and was recently caught having an affair with a man’s wife and is taking the blame for a hit and run. Since I realized that he was going to die, Gatsby’s death wasn’t surprising. However, I did feel the incredible sadness and injustice of it all since he was murdered for two things that he didn’t do (the affair with Myrtle and the hit and run). It was awful to see a good man die for the wrongs of Tom and Daisy, who are two horrible people. 

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Seven

Question: Select a passage that utilizes symbolism. Discuss how this passage contributes to your interpretation of the work as a whole and comment on the symbols on the overall meaning of the novel.
Answer:
            Chapter Seven holds the climax of The Great Gatsby. Here is where the truth of Daisy and Gatsby’s affair becomes known to Tom, Daisy finds out that Gatsby earned his wealth through illegal ways and Myrtle Wilson is killed. There is also a symbol used to describe Daisy that reveals something about her voice and its symbolism. As Nick and Gatsby converse over Daisy’s voice, Nick thinks, “Gatsby turned to me rigidly: "I can't say anything in his house, old sport."
"She's got an indiscreet voice," I remarked. "It's full of-"
I hesitated.
"Her voice is full of money," he said suddenly.
That was it. I'd never understood before. It was full of money-that was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the cymbals' song of it. . . . high in a white palace the king's daughter, the golden girl. . . .” (Fitzgerald, 120).
            Daisy’s voice had been one of her most notable qualities. When Nick goes to her house in Chapter One, he talks of her voice and says, “I looked back at my cousin, who began to ask me questions in her low, thrilling voice. It was the kind of voice that the ear follows up and down, as if each speech is an arrangement of notes that will never be played again. Her face was sad and lovely with bright things in it, bright eyes and a bright passionate mouth, but there was an excitement in her voice that men who had cared for her found difficult to forget: a singing compulsion, a whispered "Listen," a promise that she had done gay, exciting things just a while since and that there were gay, exciting things hovering in the next hour.” (Fitzgerald, 9). It’s a quality of hers that is mentioned often.
            Gatsby refers to her voice by saying, “Her voice is full of money.” (Fitzgerald, 9).By saying this, his saying that her voice sounds wealthy and makes her sound like she’s a rich, respectable and dignified person who is from ‘old money’. This helps explain why Gatsby, who grew up poor, finds her voice so alluring because it signifies his dream of being ‘old money’, which he can never be since it’s something you need to be born into.
            Nick compares Daisy to someone “high in a white palace the king’s daughter, the golden girl” (Fitzgerald, 120). To hear Nick refer to his cousin that way sheds some light on who she really is. When he says that she’s ‘high’ in a palace, it symbolizes her being unreachable and unattainable. This could refer to how Gatsby’s been trying to get her back all these years and saying that she’ll always be out of his reach, which is a foreshadowing on the end of the chapter. Also, her position high in the castle would result in her looking down on anybody not at her ‘height’ or in her social class. This would make sense based on how she was disgusted and offended by the people at Gatsby’s party because they weren’t ‘old money’ people and they behaved differently than her. The ‘white palace’ that she’s in would be symbolic of her being in a place or living a life where she’s oblivious and uncaring to the outside world or people of lesser wealth or social standing than her (unless it’s to look down on them from her elevated position). Throughout the whole novel so far, she hasn’t truly concerned herself with anything that didn’t directly affect her. The color white symbolizes perfection, safety and innocence. This can easily be taken to mean that her ‘palace’ can keep her safe and secure with her money to protect her from any harshness of the world and keep everything perfect. The innocence saying that it can keep her conscience clear so that she’s grown up without bothering to fell guilt over any of her actions that have affected or harmed others and to feel guiltless over not helping anyone else but herself. For example, when she ran over another human being, Myrtle, she didn’t even stop the car. Then she allowed Gatsby to take the blame because her main concern was not for the person that she just hit, but for making sure that she didn’t get in trouble for it. When Gatsby tells of Daisy’s reaction to the hit and run, he says “Anyhow- Daisy stepped on it. I tried to make her stop, but she couldn’t, so I pulled on the emergency break. Then she fell over into my lap and I drove on.” (Fitzgerald, 144). Her being a ‘king’s daughter’ is just showing that she comes from ‘old money’ and was born into her position without doing any work to earn her riches. She’s also ‘the golden girl’, which is again just saying that she’s perfect and loved by all. The golden has the double meaning of symbolizing ‘old money’. In conclusion, she’s a selfish, rich girl who’s never worked for her money and turns her nose up at anyone that’s ‘lesser’ than her.
            This particular passage, along with the chapter that accompanied it, affected my feelings towards Daisy greatly. She was never my favorite character and she has done some very suspect and cold things throughout the novel, but I tried to give her the benefit of the doubt so far. However, this chapter has shown her true colors and the symbol that Nick uses to describe her explains what they are perfectly. She’s simply a selfish person who doesn’t care for anything, but herself and her money. Now that I see who she really is, it affects my judgment of other characters as well.
I feel beyond sorry that Gatsby, who, although he has illegal dealings, is a gentlemanly and caring man, has become infatuated with her. My hope for him is that he can come to realize that he’s too good for her and that she doesn’t care for him and that his love for her can finally come to an end.

I’ve also begun to think that Jordan, who is very close friends with Daisy, must be worse than I was expecting as well if she finds pleasure and happiness with spending time with Daisy. So far, I’ve had little care for Jordan and didn’t have any opinions for or against her. I thought that what Nick said of her in chapter three, “She was incurably dishonest. She wasn’t able to endure being at a disadvantage and, given this unwillingness, I suppose she had begun dealing in subterfuges when she was very young in order to keep that cool, insolent smile turned to the world and yet satisfy the demands of her hard, jaunty body.” (Fitzgerald, 59), showed that she wasn’t somebody that I’d want to be around, but it made her interesting and she could still be a good person, even if she was a liar. However, I now suspect that Jordan is most likely as bad as Daisy since they’re so close. I don’t see how a good person could bear to surround themselves with a people like Daisy. For example, Nick gets sick of the lot of them and their selfish, stuck up ways and says, “I’d had enough of all of them for one day, and suddenly that included Jordan too.” (Fitzgerald, 142). 

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Six

Question: Select a passage that reveals the nature of the narrator. Discuss how this passage and the narrator contribute to your interpretation of the work as a whole. Identify the narrator’s tone and literary strategies that shape it. Comment on the narrator’s purpose in the chapter, as well as the effect the narrator is having on your reactions to the events and characters.
Answer:
            Nick attends another one of Gatsby’s parties in Chapter Six, but this time he goes with Daisy and Tom and he feels quite different about it. He says, “Tom was evidently perturbed at Daisy's running around alone, for on the following Saturday night he came with her to Gatsby's party. Perhaps his presence gave the evening its peculiar quality of oppressiveness-it stands out in my memory from Gatsby's other parties that summer. There were the same people, or at least the same sort of people, the same profusion of champagne, the same many-colored, many-keyed commotion, but I felt an unpleasantness in the air, a pervading harshness that hadn't been there before. Or perhaps I had merely grown used to it, grown to accept West Egg as a world complete in itself, with its own standards and its own great figures, second to nothing because it had no consciousness of being so, and now I was looking at it again, through Daisy's eyes. It is invariably saddening to look through new eyes at things upon which you have expended your own powers of adjustment.” (Fitzgerald, 104).
            Nick’s change of attitude toward the party could be caused by a few things. He says that one of the things that are different is “a pervading harshness that hadn't been there before” (Fitzgerald, 104). Since the only changing factor between this party and the rest is that Daisy and Tom were in attendance, it would not be unreasonably to assume that they’re the cause of this harshness and Nick’s new feelings. One way that they could’ve done this is because of the love triangle element between the three. Daisy, who is married to Tom and has a strong romantic history with Gatsby, undoubtedly caused tension while the anger between Gatsby and Tom, Tom disliking Gatsby because he didn’t trust him around Daisy and Gatsby hating Tom for being married to the woman he loves, had its own hostility. The incessant drama and stress of the whole ordeal could have easily ruined the party for Nick. This shows that Nick is affects by the affairs of others and the emotions that they give off if tension between his two friends and his cousin managed to spoil the whole evening.
            Another thing that could have affected him is Daisy and Tom’s scrutiny of the whole event. Daisy, in particular, seemed to have an effect on him. She disliked mostly the whole evening and at dinner, when they were sitting next to people who Nick was amused by last time he was them, he became embarrassed and ashamed of them around her. He states, “We were at a particularly tipsy table. That was my fault-Gatsby had been called to the phone, and I'd enjoyed these same people only two weeks before. But what had amused me then turned septic on the air now.” (Fitzgerald, 106). He later comments that Daisy hated the party and he says, “But the rest offended her-and inarguably, because it wasn't a gesture but an emotion. She was appalled by West Egg, this unprecedented "place" that Broadway had begotten upon a Long Island fishing village-appalled by its raw vigor that chafed under the old euphemisms and by the too obtrusive fate that herded its inhabitants along a short-cut from nothing to nothing. She saw something awful in the very simplicity she failed to understand.” (Fitzgerald, 107). He’s commenting on the differences between East Egg, where she lives and the people there are proper and do things that are deemed socially acceptable, and West Egg, where Gatsby and Nick live where they don’t worry about social boundaries and are free to do as they please for the most part since they aren’t confined by only doing what is ‘proper’. This shows the differences between the two places and the attitudes of the peoples that live there. It appears that Daisy’s disapproval of the event affected Nick to the point where the entire party became unappealing to him. This shows that Nick is a person easily swayed by the opinions of others.

            Another thing that is revealed about Nick during this chapter is how he reacts to people using Gatsby for his never-ending hospitality and considerable wealth. For example, when people stop by at Gatsby’s home unexpectedly to mooch off of him, Nick thinks snide remakes towards them, such as “"I'm delighted to see you," said Gatsby, standing on his porch. "I'm delighted that you dropped in." As though they cared!” (Fitzgerald, 101). This shows that Nick, who might be Gatsby’s one true friend, is annoyed and angered by others taking advantage of Gatsby. This suggests that Nick is very protective of his friends. 

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Five

Question: Select a passage that develops the relationship between Daisy and Gatsby. Discuss how this passage contributes to your interpretations of the work as a whole, including literary strategies that contribute to this relationship and shape your own reaction to both Daisy and Gatsby.
Answer:
            During Chapter Five, the long awaited meet up between Daisy and Gatsby occurs. After some tea at Nick’s home, Gatsby brings them to his house and gives them a tour, which includes showing Daisy all of his shirts. Nick describes the scene and ends it with, “Suddenly, with a strained sound, Daisy bent her head into the shirts and began to cry stormily.
            “They’re such beautiful shirts,” she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. “It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such- such beautiful shirts before.””(Fitzgerald, 92).
             Daisy’s reaction is an extremely important point of progress in the development of her relationship with Gatsby. Throughout the novel, it’s obvious that Gatsby is head-over-heels in love with Daisy and we can find examples of that in almost everything he does. However, Daisy, who had married Tom instead of waiting for Gatsby, hasn’t shown any such signs of care for Gatsby. This scene with the shirts is the first example of how she does feel about him. Her words, “It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such- such beautiful shirts before.” (Fitzgerald, 92) are a way for her to express her feelings about Gatsby. She’s not truly upset about not seeing the shirts, but more so upset that she hasn’t seen the shirts because she hasn’t seen Gatsby. This is the first real sign that she’s missed him and is sad or maybe regretful about their time apart and the way things played out between them.
            Personally, I’m not a fan of the romance between Gatsby and Daisy. I like Gatsby and his character very much and it’s undeniable that he has strong feelings towards Gatsby. This has been proven through his actions in the last few years that include buying a house just to be near her and throwing parties in the desperate hope that she might show up. I also like Gatsby as a person so far. He’s interesting and gentlemanly. He has a peculiar air about him, but that just makes him more unique. My favorite characteristic about him though would probably have to be how he works for what he wants. For example, when his wish is to see Daisy again, he goes to crazy lengths to make it happen. He’s very determined and knows how to focus on his goals, which are admirable traits.

However, I’m not as fond of Daisy. It seems that if she really loved Gatsby, she should have found a way to wait for him instead of just marrying Tom simply because he was wealthy and she wouldn’t have to wait for him. Nonetheless, I’m willing to excuse that since she was a woman in the 1920’s and I understand that things were different for women back then that I might not be fully aware of. Possibly there was a push for her to marry from her family or maybe she worried that if Gatsby were to die in the war that she’d have no way to support herself. Although I do still think that it says something about the lack of loyalty that Daisy possesses. That being said, this scene did change my mind a bit about her and their relationship. It’s the first real bit of emotion that we see from her over Gatsby and it allows me to forgive her for her decision to not wait for him during the war. It shows that she might still love him as well and that maybe the relationship, now that the feelings are shown to be mutual, might progress into what it was meant to be five years ago. 

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Four

Question: Select a passage that gives the reader background information about Gatsby. Discuss how this passage contributes to your interpretation of the work as a whole, including literary strategies that affect your feelings about Gatsby.
Answer:
            During Chapter Four, Nick has tea with Jordan Baker, who, with Gatsby’s permission, tells him about Gatsby and Daisy’s history. About this, Nick writes, “He had waited five years and bought a mansion where he dispensed starlight to casual moths-so that he could "come over" some afternoon to a stranger's garden.
"Did I have to know all this before he could ask such a little thing?"
"He's afraid, he's waited so long. He thought you might be offended. You see, he's a regular tough underneath it all."
Something worried me.
"Why didn't he ask you to arrange a meeting?"
"He wants her to see his house," she explained. "And your house is right next door."
"Oh!"
"I think he half expected her to wander into one of his parties, some night," went on Jordan, "but she never did. Then he began asking people casually if they knew her, and I was the first one he found. It was that night he sent for me at his dance, and you should have heard the elaborate way he worked up to it. Of course, I immediately suggested a luncheon in New York-and I thought he'd go mad: " 'I don't want to do anything out of the way!' he kept saying. 'I want to see her right next door.' "
When I said you were a particular friend of Tom's, he started to abandon the whole idea. He doesn't know very much about Tom, though he says he's read a Chicago paper for years just on the chance of catching a glimpse of Daisy's name."” (Fitzgerald, 78-79).
One of the characteristics that make up Gatsby the most is his infatuation and everlasting love for Daisy. Despite the facts that the couple has been separated for five years and that Daisy is married to another man, Gatsby remains devoted to her and does things that are borderline obsessive. For example, Nick states that Gatsby “had waited five years and bought a mansion” (Fitzgerald 78) just so he could meet up with her. He also threw wild, extravagant parties weekly in the hopes of her coming to one and asked people about her. Jordan mentions that “he's read a Chicago paper for years just on the chance of catching a glimpse of Daisy's name” (Fitzgerald, 79). These actions can lead one to believe that he’s either unnaturally obsessed with her or crazy with love.

This passage also explains the (possible) motives behind Gatsby’s past actions. Based on what Jordan said, his reason for throwing the parties was to attract Daisy and/or help him meet up with her once more. It also explains what he wanted from Miss Baker when he beckoned for her at the first party that Nick attended. Earlier in this chapter, Mr. Wolfsheim, Gatsby’s longtime friend, said, “Gatsby's very careful about women. He would never so much as look at a friend's wife.” (Fitzgerald, 72). Aside from Gatsby’s loyalties to his friends, a reason that he might be this way is because he only cares for Daisy and isn’t interested in any other women. 

Monday, August 25, 2014

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Three

Question: Select a passage that describes the party. Discuss how the passage contributes to your interpretation of the work as a whole, including literary strategies that affect your reaction to the character.
(Note to my teacher: I tried to figure out what a limit was for how long a passage should be, but I couldn’t find an answer. Most things just said an excerpt from a literary piece. I suspect that this one might be a little wrong, but there were so many things that I wanted to include. I tried to cut away the paragraphs that I could though to shorten it.)

Answer:
            Chapter Three begins with Nick describing Gatsby’s parties by saying, “There was music from my neighbor's house through the summer nights. In his blue gardens men and girls came and went like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and the stars. At high tide in the afternoon I watched his guests diving from the tower of his raft, or taking the sun on the hot sand of his beach while his two motor-boats slit the waters of the Sound, drawing aquaplanes over cataracts of foam. On week-ends his Rolls-Royce became an omnibus, bearing parties to and from the city between nine in the morning and long past midnight, while his station wagon scampered like a brisk yellow bug to meet all trains. And on Mondays eight servants, including an extra gardener, toiled all day with mops and scrubbing-brushes and hammers and garden-shears, repairing the ravages of the night before….
…At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down with several hundred feet of canvas and enough colored lights to make a Christmas tree of Gatsby's enormous garden. On buffet tables, garnished with glistening hors-d'oeuvres, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold. In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail was set up, and stocked with gins and liquors and with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another.
By seven o'clock the orchestra has arrived, no thin five-piece affair, but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos, and low and high drums. The last swimmers have come in from the beach now and are dressing up-stairs; the cars from New York are parked five deep in the drive, and already the halls and salons and verandas are gaudy with primary colors, and hair shorn in strange new ways, and shawls beyond the dreams of Castile. The bar is in full swing, and floating rounds of cocktails permeate the garden outside, until the air is alive with chatter and laughter, and casual innuendo and introductions forgotten on the spot, and enthusiastic meetings between women who never knew each other's names…
…I believe that on the first night I went to Gatsby's house I was one of the few guests who had actually been invited. People were not invited-they went there. They got into automobiles which bore them out to Long Island, and somehow they ended up at Gatsby's door. Once there they were introduced by somebody who knew Gatsby, and after that they conducted themselves according to the rules of behavior associated with amusement parks. Sometimes they came and went without having met Gatsby at all, came for the party with a simplicity of heart that was its own ticket of admission.” (Fitzgerald, 39-41).
One of the things that stick out the most out of what Nick’s saying is that Gatsby’s house, despite him living alone, is most of the time, if not always, filled with people. He recalls that, “men and girls came and went like moths” (Fitzgerald, 39) and, along with the guests, there were many servants (eight plus a gardener). This seems to insinuate that Gatsby doesn’t do well with loneliness or a vacant house. However, it could just be a sign of Gatsby’s extreme generosity and hospitality.
Gatsby’s wealth is made even more obvious with this passage. The aforementioned servants are one sign of that along with other things that Nick spoke of, including: two motorboats, an aquaplane, a Rolls-Royce, a station wagon, a group of caterers and an orchestra. He has the place decorated with amazing lights and tarps regularly.
Gatsby also seems to have a taste for the ‘finer things in life’. Music is mentioned often, like when Nick says, “There was music from my neighbor's house through the summer nights” (Fitzgerald, 39) and “the orchestra has arrived, no thin five-piece affair, but a whole pitful of oboes and trombones and saxophones and viols and cornets and piccolos, and low and high drums” (Fitzgerald, 40). Gatsby orders foods that are rich and decadent, including “glistening hors-d'oeuvres, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs and turkeys bewitched to a dark gold” (Fitzgerald, 40). He also seems to appreciate liquor, like “with cordials so long forgotten that most of his female guests were too young to know one from another” (Fitzgerald, 40).

Finally, it shows how the guests treated Gatsby and his house. Nick remarks, “I believe that on the first night I went to Gatsby's house I was one of the few guests who had actually been invited” (Fitzgerald, 41). This shows how Gatsby’s parties were treated like public rather than private affairs. Nick refers to Gatsby’s house once as a form of “amusement parks” (Fitzgerald, 41). They didn’t always treat it as his home or him as their host. For example, Nick says “Sometimes they came and went without having met Gatsby at all” (Fitzgerald, 41). It seems as if these guests had no problems with using his home and hospitality, sometimes every weekend, without even giving their host a ‘hello’ or ‘thank you’. 

The Great Gatsby: Chapter Two

Question: Select a passage that develops a character. Discuss how this passage contributes to your interpretation of the work as a whole, including literary strategies that affect your reaction to the character.
Answer:
            Nick opens up the second chapter by telling how he met Myrtle Wilson, Tom Buchanan’s mistress, and says, “The valley of ashes is bounded on one side by a small foul river, and, when the drawbridge is up to let barges through, the passengers on waiting trains can stare at the dismal scene for as long as half an hour. There is always a halt there of at least a minute, and it was because of this that I first met Tom Buchanan's mistress.
            The fact that he had one was insisted upon wherever he was known. His acquaintances resented the fact that he turned up in popular restaurants with her and, leaving her at a table, sauntered about, chatting with whomsoever he knew. Though I was curious to see her, I had no desire to meet her-but I did. I went up to New York with Tom on the train one afternoon, and when we stopped by the ashheaps he jumped to his feet and, taking hold of my elbow, literally forced me from the car.
"We're getting off," he insisted. "I want you to meet my girl."
             I think he'd tanked up a good deal at luncheon, and his determination to have my company bordered on violence. The supercilious assumption was that on Sunday afternoon I had nothing better to do.” (Fitzgerald, 24).
            I believe that this passage tells us a lot about Tom Buchanan. One thing is that he is extremely open about his affair with Myrtle. About this matter, Nick says, “The fact that he had one was insisted upon wherever he was known” (Fitzgerald, 24), which backs up what Jordan Baker said in chapter one about Tom having a woman in New York, “”You mean to say that you don’t know?” said Miss Baker, honesty surprised. “I thought everybody knew.”” (Fitzgerald, 15). He also mentions that Tom brings her out in public fairly often. This says that not only does Tom not seem to care about Daisy enough to not cheat on her, but he also can’t care to keep it private so that Daisy can be spared the embarrassment of everybody knowing about it.
            Tom also appears to be a rather violent man. It was mentioned in chapter one that he was very strong and had an impressive history in physical activities, especially football. This being said, he shoves and pulls at people to get them to do what he wants, which can easily be harmful with a man his size. For example, Nick states that Tom “literally forced me from the car” (Fitzgerald, 24) and, in chapter one, “turning me around by one arm… He turned me around again, politely and abruptly” (Fitzgerald, 7). Nick admits that Tom’s actions and behaviors “bordered on violence” (Fitzgerald, 24). Later on in the chapter, his violence is on display when “Tom Buchanan broke her (Myrtle’s) nose with his open hand” (Fitzgerald, 37) without hesitation over an argument regarding Myrtle saying Daisy’s name.

            Tom keeping the day’s true plans from Nick is also very inconsiderate and thoughtless. Nick, being Daisy’s cousin, could have been uncomfortable with meeting Tom’s mistress and witnessing the affair, but Tom didn’t bother to ask him and gave him no choice in the matter. He also made these plans without consenting with Nick and seeing if Nick was available or not, which Nick comments on by saying, “The supercilious assumption was that on Sunday afternoon I had nothing better to do” (Fitzgerald, 24). Tom’s actions were both rude and selfish.